In the everlasting conflict between science and religion , which will triumph? For lack of a better starting phrase , I have flaccidly anointed ((v) anoint (choose by or as if by divine intervention)) this statement which I feel is fundamentally incorrect. As I have said in my previous post , Science cannot exist without Religion and Religion without Science. Though they do not seem as opposites to each other , they are based on two very different concepts. Science is based on fact while Religion is based on Faith. Fact is the evidence that something is right while Faith is the belief that something is right with no actual evidence. This is why Science and Religion and opposites. However, in both concepts there are a significant number of "Question Marks" here and there , particularly significant in Science would be how to prove a theory is right and in Religion would be God. I am just presenting much background information on both concepts and both opposites before I delve into more detail on how Science vs Religion can be shown and is very significant in the book by Preston Douglas , Blasphemy.
First up on science! Firstly what is a theory?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment